Notice: SCAC Restructuring

The SCAC is currently undergoing restructuring and has paused updates to the Clearinghouse website. As a courtesy to our users, the New Filings email will continue to be provided by the Stanford Securities Litigation Analytics project during this period.

Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING  
—On or around 06/30/2025 (Date of last review)
Current/Last Presiding Judge:  
Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt

Filing Date: September 06, 2024

According to the Complaint, it is alleged that more than 2,000 investors from Indiana and elsewhere were victimized by a Ponzi scheme under which they were induced and encouraged to invest large sums of money with a promised return of ten percent interest every three months. Investors were urged to use whatever money they had, including their savings, IRAs, pension plans, retirement accounts, mortgages and/or open lines of credit to participate in what, unbeknownst to them, was a fraudulent scheme.

The alleged Ponzi scheme was orchestrated and carried out by Drive Planning, LLC and its founder, both of whom have recently been charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission with originating and engaging in a $300 million Ponzi scheme that defrauded over 2,000 investors. According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Drive Planning and its founder lured investors with promises of lucrative returns through purported real estate investments which in reality were unregistered securities in the form of Real Estate Acceleration Loans (REAL).

The Complaint further alleges that Defendants recommended that the Plaintiffs and countless others invest in Drive Planning, ignoring their risk-tolerance and causing them to lose large sums of money. As alleged in the SEC complaint, Drive Planning's founder actually used the unsuspecting investors’ funds to pay earlier investors and to finance his own extravagant lifestyle, including purchasing a multimillion-dollar yacht, luxury cars, and private jets. Defendants were aware, or should have been aware, that their investors’ money was unsecured and that the investment vehicle was nothing more than a massive scheme to defraud.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.