Notice: SCAC Restructuring

The SCAC is currently undergoing restructuring and has paused updates to the Clearinghouse website. As a courtesy to our users, the New Filings email will continue to be provided by the Stanford Securities Litigation Analytics project during this period.

Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED  
—On or around 07/01/2025 (Court's order of dismissal)
Current/Last Presiding Judge:  
Hon. Patti B. Saris

Filing Date: March 28, 2024

According to the Complaint, bluebird bio, Inc. is a biotechnology company that researches, develops, and commercializes gene therapies for severe genetic diseases.

On April 24, 2023, Defendants announced submission of its Biologics License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for lovotibeglogene autotemcel (lovo-cel) gene therapy in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) ages 12 and older who have a history of vaso-occlusive events (VOEs). The BLA also included a request for priority review, which, if granted, would shorten the FDA’s review of the application to six months from the time of filing, versus a standard review timeline of 10 months.

The Complaint alleges that the Company’s announcement provided investors with false and misleading information in order to bolster investor expectations and share prices. Specifically, the Complaint alleges Defendants created the false impression that: (i) they could obtain FDA approval for lovocel without any box warnings for haematological malignancies; (ii) they would be granted a priority review voucher by the FDA and in turn sell it in order to strengthen their financial position for the lovocel launch; (iii) as a result, the Company had significantly overstated Lyfgenia’s clinical and/or commercial prospects; and (iv) therefore, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times, and that as a result, Plaintiff and other shareholders purchased the Company’s securities at artificially inflated prices.

On July 17, 2024, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on August 15. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on October 11.

On May 23, 2025, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff was given leave to amend the Complaint. Lead Plaintiff did not amend the Complaint, and on July 1, the Clerk of Court dismissed the case.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.