Notice: SCAC Restructuring

The SCAC is currently undergoing restructuring and has paused updates to the Clearinghouse website. As a courtesy to our users, the New Filings email will continue to be provided by the Stanford Securities Litigation Analytics project during this period.

Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING  
—On or around 07/21/2025 (Date of last review)
Current/Last Presiding Judge:  
Hon. Sherilyn Peace Garnett

Filing Date: January 04, 2024

According to the Complaint, Maison is a specialty grocery retailer offering Asian food and merchandise to U.S. consumers.

On October 5, 2023, the Company filed its prospectus on Form 424B4 with the SEC, which forms part of the Registration Statement. In the IPO, the Company sold 2,500,000 shares of Class A common stock at a price of $4.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $10 million from the Offering.

On December 15, 2023, at approximately 2:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, Hindenburg Research published a report about Maison, alleging a number of “red flags” concerning potentially illegal activities.

The Complaint alleges that in the Registration Statement and throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the case alleges Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that the Company’s vendor XHJC Holdings Inc., is a related party; (2) that the Company’s CEO and related entities were alleged to have used supermarkets as a front to defraud the EB-5 visa program; and (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On April 4, 2024, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on June 17. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on August 16.

On March 31, 2025, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff was given leave to amend the Complaint. Lead Plaintiff filed a second Amended Complaint on April 21.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.