Notice: SCAC Restructuring

The SCAC is currently undergoing restructuring and has paused updates to the Clearinghouse website. As a courtesy to our users, the New Filings email will continue to be provided by the Stanford Securities Litigation Analytics project during this period.

Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING  
—On or around 05/19/2025 (Date of last review)
Current/Last Presiding Judge:  
Hon. Andrew S. Hanen

Filing Date: December 05, 2023

According to the Complaint, Microvast Holdings, Inc. is a lithium-ion battery technology company which designs, develops, and manufactures battery components and systems, primarily for electric commercial vehicles and utility-scale energy storage systems. The Company is headquartered in Texas and maintains a subsidiary in China.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. was formed following the July, 2021 merger of Tuscan Holdings Corp., a special purpose acquisition company, and Microvast, Inc..

In October 2022, the United States Department of Energy conditionally selected Microvast for a proposed $200 million grant to help fund a proposed polyaramid separator production facility. Polyaramid is a high-temperature resistant synthetic polymer, and a polyaramid separator is an insulating film used in high-capacity lithium-ion batteries.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that there was a reasonable likelihood that Microvast would not be awarded the Grant after due diligence was performed; (2) that negotiations had ceased and the Grant rescinded; (3) that the Company misrepresented the nature and profitability of its businesses and partnerships; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On February 28, 2024, the Court issued an Order appointing Co-Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel. Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended Complaint on May 13.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.