Notice: SCAC Restructuring

The Stanford Securities Class Action Clearinghouse (SCAC) is currently under construction and is temporarily unavailable as it undergoes updates and improvements. The Clearinghouse is expected to return as part of the Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance in Winter 2026.

During this period, updates and new filings will not be available.

For urgent inquiries, please contact rockprograms@law.stanford.edu.

Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED  
—On or around 07/10/2023 (Date of order of final judgment)
Current/Last Presiding Judge:  
Hon. Patrick J. Schiltz

Filing Date: December 14, 2021

According to the Complaint, Sleep Number Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides sleep solutions and services in the United States. The Company is best known for its smart beds which employ the Company’s technology to automatically adjust the mattress’s firmness, comfort and support as one sleeps.

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose that: (i) Sleep Number had suffered a severe disruption in its supply chain for foam as a result of Winter Storm Uri; (ii) Sleep Number did not have in place the supply chain flexibility, redundancies, and fail-safes, as had been represented to investors, sufficient to offset the foam supply disruption caused by Winter Storm Uri; (iii) because foam was a necessary component for Sleep Number’s production of its primary mattress products, Sleep Number’s ability to timely fulfill customer orders had been materially impaired; (iv) thus, Sleep Number was unable to meet surging customer demand for Sleep Number’s products; and (v) that, as a result, Sleep Number had been forced to delay mattress shipments to end consumers, pushing millions of dollars’ worth of sales into subsequent quarters and negatively impacting Sleep Number’s financial results.

On May 20, 2022, the Court issued an Order appointing Co-Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel. Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended Complaint on July 19. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on September 19.

On July 10, 2023, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The case was dismissed with prejudice.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.