Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 04/20/2022 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: November 05, 2020

According to the Complaint, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company that focuses on the development and commercialization of therapeutics to treat progressive non-viral liver diseases in the U.S. Intercept’s lead product candidate is Ocaliva (OCA), a farnesoid X receptor agonist used for the treatment of PBC, a rare and chronic liver disease, in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid in adults. The Company is also developing OCA for various other indications, including NASH.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and compliance policies. Specifically, the Complaint alleges Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Defendants downplayed the true scope and severity of safety concerns associated with Ocaliva's use in treating PBC; (ii) the foregoing increased the likelihood of an FDA investigation into Ocaliva's development, thereby jeopardizing Ocaliva's continued marketability and the sustainability of its sales; (iii) any purported benefits associated with OCA's efficacy in treating NASH were outweighed by the risks of its use; (iv) as a result, the FDA was unlikely to approve the Company's NDA for OCA in treating patients with liver fibrosis due to NASH; and (v) as a result of all the foregoing, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On January 1, 2021, the Court issued an Order transferring this case to the Southern District of New York.

On January 25, 2021, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed a corrected first amended Complaint on March 15. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on April 26.

On March 21, 2022, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs were given leave to amend the Complaint. On April 19, Plaintiffs notified the Court that they did not intend to file an amended Complaint or appeal the Court's March 21, 2022 Order. On April 20, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.