Notice: SCAC Restructuring

The Stanford Securities Class Action Clearinghouse (SCAC) is currently under construction and is temporarily unavailable as it undergoes updates and improvements. The Clearinghouse is expected to return as part of the Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance in Winter 2026.

During this period, updates and new filings will not be available.

For urgent inquiries, please contact rockprograms@law.stanford.edu.

Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED  
—On or around 10/18/2024 (Date of order of final judgment)
Current/Last Presiding Judge:  
Hon. Paul G. Gardephe

Filing Date: October 16, 2020

According to the Complaint, Evolus, Inc. is a medical aesthetic company formed with the sole aim to develop and introduce a cheaper alternative to Botox® to the U.S. market.

The Complaint alleges that Evolus made false and misleading statements to the public throughout the Class Period and failed to disclose that: (1) the real source of botulinum toxin bacterial strain as well as the manufacturing processes used to develop Jeuveau™ originated with and were misappropriated from Medytox; (2) sufficient evidentiary support existed for the allegations that Evolus misappropriated certain trade secrets relating to the botulin toxin strain and the manufacturing processes for the development of Jeuveau™; (3) as a result, Evolus faced a real threat of regulatory and/or court action, prohibiting the import, marketing, and sale of Jeuveau™; (4) which in turn seriously threatened Evolus’ ability to commercialize Jeuveau™ in the United States and generate revenue; and (5) any revenues generated from the sale of Jeuveau™ were based on Evolus’ unlawful activities, including the misappropriation of trade secrets and secret manufacturing processes belonging to Allergan and Medytox.

On November 13, 2020, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases. On September 17, 2021, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on November 17. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on June 16, 2022.

On September 26, 2024, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff was given leave to amend the Complaint. Plaintiff did not amend the Complaint, and on October 18, the Court entered judgment in favor of Defendants and closed the case.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.