On or around 08/16/2021 (Date of last review)
Filing Date: September 15, 2020
According to the Complaint, Nikola Corporation purports to operate as an integrated zero emissions transportation systems provider which designs and manufactures battery-electric and hydrogen-electric vehicles, electric vehicle drivetrains, vehicle components, energy storage systems, and hydrogen fueling station infrastructure.
The Complaint alleges that Defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) VectoIQ did not engage in proper due diligence regarding its merger with Nikola; (2) Nikola overstated its “in-house” design, manufacturing, and testing capabilities; (3) Nikola overstated its hydrogen production capabilities; (4) as a result, Nikola overstated its ability to lower the cost of hydrogen fuel; (5) Nikola's founder and Executive Chairman tweeted a misleading “test” video of the Company’s Nikola Two truck; (6) the work experience and background of key Nikola employees had been overstated and obfuscated; (7) Nikola did not have five Tre trucks completed; and (8) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.
On December 15, 2020, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases and appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. On December 30, several Movants petitioned the Court of Appeals to vacate the District Court's Order appointing Lead Plaintiff. On July 23, 2021, the Court of Appeals granted in part the appeal and ordered the District Court to vacate its Order appointing Lead Plaintiff.
Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.
When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.