Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 06/17/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: June 15, 2020

According to the Complaint, SB One Bancorp is the holding company for SB One Bank, a full-service, commercial bank that operates regionally with eighteen branch locations in New Jersey and New York. In addition to its branches and loan production offices, SB One Bank offers a full service insurance agency, SB One Insurance Agency, Inc., and wealth services through SB One Wealth.

This action stems from a proposed transaction announced on March 12, 2020, pursuant to which SB One Bancorp will be acquired by Provident Financial Services, Inc.

On March 11, 2020, SB One’s Board of Directors caused the Company to enter into an agreement and plan of merger with Provident Financial. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, shareholders of SB One will receive 1.357 shares of Provident Financial common stock for each share of SB One they own.

On May 8, 2020, Defendants filed a proxy statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Proposed Transaction, which scheduled a stockholder vote on the Proposed Transaction for June 24, 2020. The Complaint alleges that the Proxy Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Proxy Statement false and misleading.


Sector: Financial
Industry: Regional Banks
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: SBBX
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Delaware
DOCKET #: 20-CV-00809
JUDGE: Hon. Leonard P. Stark
DATE FILED: 06/15/2020
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/15/2020
  1. Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. (Wilmington)
  2. RM Law, P.C. (Berwyn)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available