On or around 03/09/2020 (Date of last review)
Filing Date: March 06, 2020
According to the Complaint, PharmaCielo, through its subsidiary, PharmaCielo Colombia Holdings S.A.S., purports to cultivate, process, produce, and supply medicinal-grade cannabis oil extracts and related products in Colombia and internationally.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) PharmaCielo engaged in an undisclosed related party transactions with General Extract LLC; (2) PharmaCielo engaged in misleading transactions and loans with General Extract LLC and XPhyto Therapeutics Corp.; (3) PharmaCielo’s Research Technology and Processing Centre was never on-schedule and is delayed; (4) the Rionegro facility is located on a floodplain and contaminated with mold and pesticides from its previous tenants; (5) PharmaCielo’s Cauca Department land has never been utilized by the Company and is idle; and (6) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: PharmaCielo Ltd.
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs
Ticker Symbol: PCLOF
Company Market: OTC-BB
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
First Identified Complaint
Daniel Gabbard, et al. v. PharmaCielo Ltd., et al.