Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 06/01/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: December 02, 2019

According to the Complaint, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., with its subsidiaries, designs, engineers, manufactures, distributes, and sells vehicles, components, and production systems.

The Complaint alleges that Defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Fiat employed a bribery scheme to obtain favorable terms in its collective bargaining agreement with International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America; (2) high-ranking Fiat officials were aware of and authorized the scheme; and (3) due to the foregoing Defendants’ statements about Fiat’s receivables, business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

On March 10, 2020, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases and appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on June 1.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Industry: Auto & Truck Manufacturers
Headquarters: United Kingdom

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: FCAU
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: E.D. New York
DOCKET #: 19-CV-06770
JUDGE: Hon. Frederic Block
DATE FILED: 12/02/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/26/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/20/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (NY)
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: E.D. New York
DOCKET #: 19-CV-06770
JUDGE: Hon. Frederic Block
DATE FILED: 06/01/2020
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/26/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/20/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bernstein Liebhard LLP (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available