Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 02/03/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: November 06, 2019

According to the Complaint, UP Fintech Holding Limited ("Fintech") provides online brokerage services focusing on Chinese investors and has developed a purported brokerage platform that can be accessed through its app and website.

On February 22, 2019, Fintech filed a registration statement on Form F-1 with the SEC in connection with the IPO, which, after several amendments, was declared effective by the SEC on March 19, 2019 (the “Registration Statement”). The Registration Statement was filed with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by the ADSs to be sold in the IPO.

On March 20, 2019, Fintech filed a prospectus for the IPO on Form 424B4, which incorporated and formed part of the Registration Statement (collectively, the “Offering Documents”). That same day, Fintech announced the pricing of its IPO of 13 million ADSs, each representing fifteen Class A ordinary shares of the Company, at $8.00 per ADS. The ADSs began trading the same day on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “TIGR.” Fintech raised $104 million in proceeds from the IPO.

The Complaint alleges that the Offering Documents were negligently prepared and, as a result, contained untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state other facts necessary to make the statements made not misleading and were not prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations governing their preparation. Additionally, throughout the Class Period, the Complaint alleges that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies.

On January 24, 2020, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel.


Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services
Headquarters: China


Ticker Symbol: TIGR
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 19-CV-10326
JUDGE: Hon. Jesse M. Furman
DATE FILED: 11/06/2019
CLASS PERIOD END: 05/16/2019
  1. Pomerantz LLP (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available