Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 08/26/2019 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: August 02, 2019

According to the Complaint, Vical is a company historically focused on research and development of biopharmaceutical products for prevention and treatment of chronic or life-threatening infectious diseases, including antiviral and antifungal candidates in clinical development.

This action stems from a proposed transaction announced on June 3, 2019, pursuant to which Vical Incorporated will merge with Brickell Biotech, Inc.

On June 2, 2019, Vical’s Board of Directors caused Vical to enter into an agreement and plan of merger with Brickell. Following the consummation of the Proposed Transaction, Brickell’s stockholders will own approximately 60% of the combined company, and Vical’s stockholders will own approximately 40% of the combined company.

On July 12, 2019, Defendants filed a proxy statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Proposed Transaction, which scheduled a stockholder vote on the Proposed Transaction for August 30, 2019. The Complaint alleges that the Proxy Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Proxy Statement false and misleading.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on August 26, 2019.


Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: VICL
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Delaware
DOCKET #: 19-CV-01457
JUDGE: Hon. Judge Colm F. Connolly
DATE FILED: 08/02/2019
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/02/2019
  1. Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. (Wilmington)
  2. RM Law, P.C. (Berwyn)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available