Processing your request


please wait...

 | Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

L Brands, Inc.

Case Summary

L Brands, Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 02/18/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: July 23, 2019

According to the Complaint, L Brands is a specialty retailer of women’s intimate apparel and personal
care and beauty products.

The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose adverse information regarding L Brands’ business and prospects, which caused L Brands stock to trade at artificially inflated prices of more than $37 per share during the Class Period. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that, prior to and during the Class Period, L Brands’ Victoria’s Secret and PINK businesses began to experience deteriorating operating performance due to, among other things, increased competition from new lingerie brands.

On October 16, 2019, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases and appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed a consolidated amended Complaint on December 20.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: L Brands, Inc.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Industry: Apparel/Accessories
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: LB
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Rickey Walker, et al. v. L Brands, Inc., et al.

COURT: S.D. Ohio
DOCKET #: 19-CV-03186
JUDGE: Hon. Sarah D. Morrison
DATE FILED: 07/23/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/31/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/19/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Brennan, Manna & Diamond, LLC
  2. Johnson Fistel, LLP
  3. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (Melville)
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws 07/23/2019
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 10/16/2019
3 Order 10/16/2019
4 Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws 12/20/2019

Reference Complaint

Daniel B. O'Leary, et al. v. L Brands, Inc., et al.

COURT: S.D. Ohio
DOCKET #: 19-CV-03186
JUDGE: Hon. Sarah D. Morrison
DATE FILED: 12/20/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/31/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/19/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Brennan, Manna & Diamond, LLC
  2. Johnson Fistel, LLP (Marietta)
  3. Murray Murphy Moul + Basil LLP (Columbus)
  4. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (Melville)
Reference Complaint (REF) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 12/20/2019

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases