Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 09/11/2019 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: June 03, 2019

According to the Complaint, Aratana is a pet therapeutics company focused on developing and commercializing
innovative therapeutics for dogs and cats.

This action stems from a proposed transaction announced on April 26, 2019, pursuant to which Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. will be acquired by Elanco Animal Health Incorporated. On April 26, 2019, Aratana’s Board of Directors caused the Company to enter into an agreement and plan of merger with Elanco. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Aratana’s stockholders will receive 0.1481 shares of Elanco stock and one contingent value right for each share of Aratana common stock they own.

On May 30, 2019, Defendants filed a Registration Statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Proposed Transaction. The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Registration Statement false and misleading.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on September 11, 2019.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: PETX
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Delaware
DOCKET #: 19-CV-01030
JUDGE: Hon. Colm F. Connolly
DATE FILED: 06/03/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/26/2019
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/03/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. (Wilmington)
  2. RM Law, P.C. (Berwyn)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available