Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 09/13/2019 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: May 28, 2019

According to the Complaint, Bloom Energy designs, manufactures, and sells solid-oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation. The fuel cell systems, or Energy Servers, convert fuel into electricity without combustion, providing efficient energy generation with reduced operating costs and lower greenhouse gas emissions.

In July 2018, Bloom Energy commenced the initial public stock offering, issuing approximately 18 million shares of its common stock to the investing public at $15.00 per share, all pursuant to the Registration Statement.

The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement was materially misleading as it failed to disclose known events and trends that were severely affecting the Company’s business and that made investment in Bloom Energy significantly riskier than presented in the Registration Statement. In particular, the Complaint alleges the Registration Statement failed to disclose that the Company was experiencing material construction delays. These construction delays would cause system deployments to fall significantly below even the low end of the Company’s previously announced guidance.

On September 3, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel.


Sector: Utilities
Industry: Electric Utilities
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: BE
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 19-CV-02935
JUDGE: Hon. William H. Orrick
DATE FILED: 05/28/2019
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/05/2018
  1. Pomerantz LLP (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available