Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 07/12/2019 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: April 15, 2019

According to the Complaint, South Carolina Public Service Authority, a state-owned utility that is also known as Santee Cooper, produces, distributes, and sells electric power within the counties of Berkeley, Calhoun, Charleston, Clarendon, Colleton, Dorchester, Orangeburg, and Sumter, South Carolina.

Each May during the Class Period, Santee Cooper issued Mini-Bonds. The Mini Bonds were “sold directly by the South Carolina Public Service Authority (the “Authority”) only to residents of the State of South Carolina (the “State”), customers of the Authority, members of electric cooperatives organized and existing under the laws of the State, and electric customers of the Bamberg Board of Public Works, South Carolina and the City of Georgetown, South Carolina.” The Mini-Bonds were sold pursuant to “Official Statements.” The Complaint alleges the Official Statements were materially false and misleading because, as described in the Complaint, Santee Cooper knew that (1) SCE&G was not providing adequate oversight of the Nuclear Project; (2) Santee Cooper’s own attempts to supervise the Nuclear Project were failing; and (3) that the Nuclear Project was already hopelessly behind schedule and unlikely to be completed, if at all, prior to the deadlines to earn financially necessary tax credits under the Energy Policy Act.



COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Utilities
Industry: Electric Utilities
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol:
Company Market:
Market Status:

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. South Carolina
DOCKET #: 19-CV-01102
JUDGE: Hon. Richard M Gergel
DATE FILED: 04/15/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/01/2014
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/31/2017
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Hopkins Law Firm, LLC
    12019 Ocean Highway P.O. Box 1885, Hopkins Law Firm, LLC, SC 29585
    843.314.4202 ·
  2. The Weiser Law Firm, P.C.
    121 N. Wayne, Ave, Suite 100, The Weiser Law Firm, P.C.
    610.667.7706 · rw@weiserlawfirm.com
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available