Processing your request


please wait...

 | Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

Taronis Technologies Inc.

Case Summary

Taronis Technologies Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 04/08/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: April 15, 2019

According to the Complaint, Taronis purportedly operates as an energy company that offers technology solutions to create, process, and produce hydrogen-based fuel through the gasification of carb-rich liquids. Taronis formerly operated under the name of MagneGas Applied Technology Solutions, Inc.

The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company did not have a contract with the City of San Diego; (2) the Company or its management had engaged in a scheme to defraud; and (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On June 21, 2019, the case was transferred to the District of Arizona under Docket 19-CV-04529.

On July 10, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on August 30. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on October 14. On April 8, 2020, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: Taronis Technologies Inc.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Energy
Industry: Alternative Energy
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: TRNX
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Chad Hatten, et al. v. Taronis Technologies Inc, et al.

COURT: M.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 19-CV-00889
JUDGE: Hon. Charlene Edwards Honeywell
DATE FILED: 04/15/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 01/28/2019
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/12/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Tomchin & Odom, PA
  2. Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP (New York)
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws 04/15/2019
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 04/25/2019

Reference Complaint

Kui Zhu, et al. v. Taronis Technologies Inc., et al.

COURT: D. Arizona
DOCKET #: 19-CV-04529
JUDGE: Hon. Charlene Edwards Honeywell
DATE FILED: 08/30/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 01/28/2019
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/12/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Johnson Fistel, LLP (Marietta)
  2. Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP (New York)
Reference Complaint (REF) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Order 07/10/2019
2 First Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws 08/30/2019
3 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 04/08/2020
4 Order 04/08/2020

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases