Processing your request


please wait...

 | Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

Mobile TeleSystems PJSC : American Depositary Shares

Case Summary

Mobile TeleSystems PJSC : American Depositary Shares Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 11/13/2019 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: March 19, 2019

According to the Complaint, Mobile TeleSystems purports to provide telecommunication services in Russia, Ukraine, Turkmenistan, and Armenia.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Mobile TeleSystems and its subsidiary were involved in a scheme to pay $420 million in bribes in Uzbekistan; (2) consequently, Mobile TeleSystems knew or should have known it would be forced to pay substantial fines to the U.S. government after disclosing in 2014 that the U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission were investigating its Uzbekistan operations; (3) Mobile TeleSystems’ level of cooperation with the U.S. government and remediation was lacking; (4) due to the aforementioned misconduct, Mobile TeleSystems would be forced to pay approximately $850 million in criminal penalties to the U.S. government; and (5) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.

On September 11, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on November 13.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: Mobile TeleSystems PJSC

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Communications Services
Headquarters: Russian

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: MBT
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Shayan Salim, et al. v. Mobile TeleSystems PJSC, et al.

COURT: E.D. New York
DOCKET #: 19-CV-01589
JUDGE: Hon. Ann M Donnelly
DATE FILED: 03/19/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/19/2014
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/07/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (New York)
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws 03/19/2019
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 09/11/2019
3 Memorandum and Order 09/11/2019

Reference Complaint

Hunnewell Partners (UK) LLP, et al. v. Mobile TeleSystems PJSC, et al.

COURT: E.D. New York
DOCKET #: 19-CV-01589
JUDGE: Hon. Ann M Donnelly
DATE FILED: 11/13/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/19/2014
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/07/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (NY)
    275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor, The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (NY), NY 10016
    212.686.1060 ·
Reference Complaint (REF) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws 11/13/2019
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 11/13/2019

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases