Processing your request


please wait...

 | Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.

Case Summary

U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 07/18/2019 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: March 08, 2019

According to the law firm press release, the complaint alleges that the Offering Documents failed to disclose that: (1) a shortage of trucks was negatively impacting U.S. Xpress’s dedicated division; (2) (a) certain shipping patterns had been performing differently than expected and, as a result, (b) utilization and driver retention and hiring were being negatively affected, and as a result, (c) U.S. Xpress’s dedicated accounts, including one large account, were being negatively impacted; and as a result, (d) U.S. Xpress’s OTR division was providing continued support to the dedicated division; (3) (a) U.S. Xpress failed to stay informed regarding two large liability events; and as a result (b) U.S. Xpress’s insurance claim expense was understated; and (4) U.S. Xpress’s cost per mile for driver wages and independent contractors was exceeding the Company’s internal expectations.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on May 9, 2019. A related case continues under Docket 19-CV-00098. On July 18, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Transportation
Industry: Trucking
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: USX
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Benjamin Smith, et al. v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., et al.

COURT: E.D. Tennessee
DOCKET #: 19-CV-00078
JUDGE: Hon. Harry S Mattice, Jr
DATE FILED: 03/08/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 06/15/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/08/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Holifield Janich Rachal & Associates, PLLC
    11907 Kingston Pike, Ste. 201, Holifield Janich Rachal & Associates, PLLC, TN 37934
    865.566.0115 865.566.0119 ·
  2. Levi & Korsinsky (Stamford)
    733 Summer Street, Suite 304, Levi & Korsinsky (Stamford), CT 06901
    203-992-4523 ·
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws 03/08/2019
2 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 05/09/2019
3 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 05/10/2019

Reference Complaint

Lewis Stein, et al. v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., et al.

COURT: E.D. Tennessee
DOCKET #: 19-CV-00098
JUDGE: Hon. Harry S Mattice, Jr
DATE FILED: 04/02/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 06/15/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/02/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bramlett Law Offices (Nashville)
    2400 Crestmoor Road; P.O. Box 150734, Bramlett Law Offices (Nashville), TN 37215
    615.248.2828 866.816.4116 ·
  2. Pomerantz LLP (New York)
    600 Third Avenue, Pomerantz LLP (New York), NY 10016
    212.661.1100 212.661.8665 · info@pomerantzlaw.com/
Reference Complaint (REF) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws 04/02/2019
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 07/18/2019
3 Order 07/18/2019

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases