Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED  
—On or around 08/01/2024 (Date of order of final judgment)
Current/Last Presiding Judge:  
Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer

Filing Date: January 17, 2019

Plaintiff's law firm issued a press release on January 17, 2019, announcing the lawsuit. According to the press release, on December 18, 2015, Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd. ("Qihoo 360" or the "Company"), purported to be the leading internet company in the People’s Republic of China, announced that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which it would be acquired by a consortium of investors in an “all-cash transaction valued at approximately $9.3 billion, including the redemption of approximately $1.6 billion of debt” (the “Merger”). Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the Company’s shares and ADS would cease to exist in exchange for the right to receive a cash amount without interest.

The Complaint alleges that Qihoo 360 shareholders were misled into accepting consideration from the Merger that was well below fair value for their Qihoo 360 shares. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose: (1) that the Company’s Proxy materials and Annual Report misrepresented and/or omitted material information that was necessary for Company shareholders to make an informed decision concerning whether to vote in favor of the Merger; (2) that contrary to the representations in the Proxy and the Annual Report, the Company already had plans to relist its shares in China prior to closing the Merger and its delisting from the NYSE; and (3) as a result, the Company’s statements about its business, operations, and prospects lacked a reasonable basis.

On April 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Motion to transfer the case to the Central District of California. On April 18, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to transfer. The Court dismissed the case without prejudice. A related action continues under Docket 19-CV-01619 in the Central District of California.

On June 3, 2019, Defendants filed a Motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of New York. On July 1, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel. Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended Complaint on August 30. On October 24, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to transfer venue to the Southern District of New York. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on December 23. On August 14, 2020, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The case was dismissed with prejudice. Lead Plaintiffs filed a notice appealing the Court's Dismissal Order on September 10.

On November 24, 2021, the Court of Appeals vacated the Court's Dismissal Order and remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings. One of the individual Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on April 29, 2022. On March 21, 2023, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part the Motion to Dismiss.

On February 12, 2024, the parties entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement. The Court granted preliminary approval of the Settlement on March 12.

On August 1, 2024, the Court granted final approval of the Settlement, including an award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, and entered Final Judgment.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.