Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 01/17/2020 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: January 08, 2019

According to the Complaint, Natural Health Trends operates as an international direct-selling and e-commerce company. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Natural Health Trends was operating as a pyramid scheme in China, which is contrary to Chinese law; (2) consequently, Natural Health Trends was not in compliance with applicable Chinese law; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about Natural Health Trends’ business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

On May 3, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on June 3. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on September 7. On December 20, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs were given leave to amend the Complaint. On January 13, 2020, Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Intent Not to File Second Amended Complaint.” On January 17, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Consumer Non-Cyclical
Industry: Personal & Household Products
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: NHTC
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: C.D. California
DOCKET #: 19-CV-00163
JUDGE:
DATE FILED: 01/08/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/27/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 01/05/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (New Los Angeles)
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: C.D. California
DOCKET #: 19-CV-00163
JUDGE:
DATE FILED: 06/03/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/27/2016
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/21/2019
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
    333 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor, The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., CA 90071
    213.785.2610 213.226-4684 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available