Liberty Health Sciences Inc. Securities Litigation
On or around 01/08/2019 (Ongoing date of last review)
Filing Date: January 07, 2019
Plaintiff's law firm issued a press release on January 7, 2019, announcing the filing of the lawsuit. According to the press release, Liberty Health Sciences Inc. ("Liberty" or the "Company") was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on November 9, 2011, as SecureCom Mobile Inc. The Company’s principal business activity is the production and distribution of medical cannabis through its wholly-owned subsidiary DFMMJ LLC (d/b/a Liberty Health Sciences Florida Ltd.). Aphria Inc., which also produces and distributes cannabis, has had long-standing ties with Liberty, starting from the very beginning of both companies.
The Complaint alleges throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Liberty, in conjunction with Aphria, was involved in a scheme whereby numerous fraudulent acquisitions and transactions were made to provide undue benefits to both companies’ insiders; and (ii) as a result, Liberty’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: Liberty Health Sciences Inc.
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs
Ticker Symbol: LHSIF
Company Market: OTC-BB
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
First Identified Complaint
Nancy Lin, et al. v. Liberty Health Sciences Inc., et al.