Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 03/29/2019 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: December 21, 2018

According to the Complaint, LSC Communications Inc. ("LSC" or the "Company") prints magazines, catalogs, retail inserts, books and directories, and sells office supplies such as filing products, envelopes, note-taking products, binders and forms. Printing is an $84 billion industry, and LSC was the third-largest printing company in 2017 with $3.6 billion in consolidated net sales in 2017.

The Proposed Transaction was first disclosed on October 31, 2018, when LSC and Quad/Graphics announced that they had entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which Quad/Graphics will acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of LSC in exchange for 0.625 shares of Quad/Graphics Class A common stock (the “Merger Consideration”). The deal is valued at approximately $1.4 billion and is expected to close in mid-2019.

On December 12, 2018, Defendants filed the S-4 with the SEC. The Complaint alleges that significant and material facts were not provided to Plaintiff and the Class. Without such information, LSC shareholders cannot make a fully informed decision concerning whether or not to vote in favor of the Proposed Transaction.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Business Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: LKSD
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. Illinois
DOCKET #: 18-CV-08419
JUDGE: Hon. Sharon Johnson Coleman
DATE FILED: 12/21/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 10/31/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 12/21/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel LLP
    30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3200, Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel LLP, IL 60602
    734.769.2144 734.769.1207 ·
  2. Rowley Law PLLC
    50 Main Street, Suite 1000, Rowley Law PLLC, NY 10606
    914.400.1920 914.301.3514 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available