Notice: SCAC Restructuring

The Stanford Securities Class Action Clearinghouse (SCAC) is currently under construction and is temporarily unavailable as it undergoes updates and improvements. The Clearinghouse is expected to return as part of the Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance in Winter 2026.

During this period, updates and new filings will not be available.

For urgent inquiries, please contact rockprograms@law.stanford.edu.

Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    SETTLED  
—On or around 05/16/2025 (Settlement preliminarily approval)
Current/Last Presiding Judge:  
Hon. Nina Gershon

Filing Date: December 19, 2018

According to the Complaint, Dentsply Sirona, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and markets dental products and services for use by dentists. Dentsply Sirona is effectively the successor-in-interest to Dentsply Intl. and resulted from the merger of Dentsply Intl. and Sirona.

The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants falsely represented the drivers of the Company's financial performance. Specifically, Defendants attributed the Company's financial performance to the Company's "innovation," "operational improvement efforts," "new products," and "continued investments in sales and marketing" and told investors that these factors helped the Company succeed despite the "highly competitive" market for its products. In reality, the Company's financial results had been buoyed by an anticompetitive scheme among the Company's three primary distributors that suppressed competition in the dental supply market and artificially inflated the price of dental supplies sold by Dentsply.

On March 11, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on May 6. On January 22, 2021, Lead Plaintiff filed a second Amended Complaint. Lead Plaintiff corrected the second Amended Complaint on January 25. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the second Amended Complaint on May 21.

On March 29, 2023, the Court issued an Order denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

The parties entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement on March 12, 2025. The Court granted preliminary approval of the Settlement on May 16.

Protected Content


Please Log In or Sign Up for a free account to access restricted features of the Clearinghouse website, including the Advanced Search form and the full case pages.

When you sign up, you will have the option to save your search queries performed on the Advanced Search form.