According to the Complaint, Dentsply Sirona designs, develops, manufactures and markets dental products and services for use by dentists. Dentsply Sirona is effectively the successor-in-interest to Dentsply Intl. and resulted from the merger of Dentsply Intl. and Sirona.

The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Defendants falsely represented the drivers of the Company's financial performance. Specifically, Defendants attributed the Company's financial performance to the Company's "innovation," "operational improvement efforts," "new products," and "continued investments in sales and marketing" and told investors that these factors helped the Company succeed despite the "highly competitive" market for its products. In reality, the Company's financial results had been buoyed by an anticompetitive scheme among the Company's three primary distributors that suppressed competition in the dental supply market and artificially inflated the price of dental supplies sold by Dentsply.

On March 11, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on May 6.