On or around 01/08/2019 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)
Filing Date: December 18, 2018
According to the Complaint, Red Hat is a global provider of open source software solutions to meet the information technology (“IT”) needs of enterprises and service providers.
On October 28, 2018, Red Hat and IBM issued a joint press release announcing they had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 28, 2018 (the “Merger Agreement”) to sell Red Hat to IBM. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, each Red Hat stockholder will receive $190.00 in cash for each share of Red Hat common stock they own (the “Merger Consideration”). The Proposed Transaction is valued at approximately $34.0 billion.
On December 12, 2018, Red Hat filed a Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) with the SEC. The Complaint alleges that the Proxy Statement, which recommends that Red Hat stockholders vote in favor of the Proposed Transaction, omits or misrepresents material information concerning, among other things: (i) the data and inputs underlying the financial valuation analyses that support the fairness opinions provided by the Company’s financial advisors; (ii) the background process leading to the Proposed Transaction; and (iii) financial advisors' potential conflicts of interest.
This case was voluntarily dismissed on January 8, 2019.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: Red Hat, Inc.
Industry: Software & Programming
Headquarters: United States
Ticker Symbol: RHT
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.