Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 07/22/2019 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: December 12, 2018

According to the Complaint, Tenaris produces and sells seamless and welded steel tubular products and related services for the oil and gas industry, and other industrial applications.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Tenaris’s CEO and Chairman knew that one of his company’s executives paid cash to government officials from 2009 to 2012 to expedite compensation payments for the sale of Sidor; (2) this conduct would lead to the CEO being charged in a graft scheme, and subject Tenaris, its affiliates, and/or executives to heightened governmental scrutiny; and (3) as a result, Tenaris’s public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

On April 29, 2019, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases and appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel. Lead Plaintiffs filed a consolidated Complaint on July 19.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Energy
Industry: Oil & Gas Operations
Headquarters: Luxembourg

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: TS
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: E.D. New York
DOCKET #: 18-CV-07059
JUDGE: Hon. Raymond J. Dearie
DATE FILED: 12/12/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/01/2014
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/27/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: E.D. New York
DOCKET #: 18-CV-07059
JUDGE: Hon. Raymond J. Dearie
DATE FILED: 07/19/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/01/2014
CLASS PERIOD END: 12/05/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP
    1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 , Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, CA 90067
    (310) 201-9150 (310) 432-1495 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available