Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    SETTLED
On or around 05/27/2020 (Date of order of final judgment)

Filing Date: December 06, 2018

According to the Complaint, Arris International PLC ("Arris" or the Company) is a global leader in entertainment and communications solutions.

On November 8, 2018, CommScope Holding Company, Inc. ("Commscope") issued a press release announcing the Proposed Transaction, the sale of Arris to Commscope.

The Complaint alleges that on November 30, 2018, Defendants issued materially incomplete and misleading disclosures in the Schedule 14A Preliminary Proxy Statement (the “Proxy”) filed with the SEC in connection with the Proposed Transaction. The Complaint alleges that the Proxy is deficient and misleading in that it fails to provide adequate disclosure of all material information related to the Proposed Transaction.

On January 23, 2019, the parties filed a notice of proposed Settlement of the actions. Pursuant to their negotiations, the Issuer Defendant agreed to file a Form 8-K with the SEC on January 18, 2019 (the "Supplemental Disclosures"). On December 19, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement. The Court issued an Order preliminarily approving the Settlement on January 9, 2020. On May 27, 2020, the Court granted final approval of the Settlement and entered Final Judgment.


Sector: Technology
Industry: Communications Equipment
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: ARRS
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. Georgia
DOCKET #: 18-CV-05555
JUDGE: Hon. William M Ray, II
DATE FILED: 12/06/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 12/06/2018
  1. Levi & Korsinsky LLP (DC)
  2. Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available