Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 06/28/2020 (Other)

Filing Date: December 05, 2018

According to the Complaint, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima ("Loma Negra" or the Company) is a South American manufacturer and distributor of cement, concrete, and other building materials.

In November 2017, Defendants commenced Loma Negra’s initial public offering (“IPO”), issuing approximately 53.5 million ADS to the investing public at $19 per share, all pursuant to the Company’s Registration Statement.

The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement contained untrue statements of material fact and omitted to state material facts both required by governing regulations and necessary to make the statements made not misleading.

On February 25, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on April 26. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on September 19. On April 27, 2020, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. On May 28, Lead Plaintiff filed a notice appealing the Court's Dismissal Order.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Capital Goods
Industry: Construction - Raw Materials
Headquarters: Argentina

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: LOMA
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 18-CV-11323
JUDGE: Hon. Louis L. Stanton
DATE FILED: 12/05/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/02/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 12/05/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Hedin Hall LLP
  2. Kaskela Law LLC
  3. Pomerantz LLP (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 18-CV-11323
JUDGE: Hon. Louis L. Stanton
DATE FILED: 04/26/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/02/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 05/23/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available