Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 04/01/2019 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: November 29, 2018

According to the Complaint, Black Box Corporation (“Black Box” or the “Company”) is a leading digital solutions provider dedicated to helping customers design, build, manage, and secure their IT infrastructure. This action stems from a proposed transaction announced on November 11, 2018 (the “Proposed Transaction”), pursuant to which Black Box will be acquired by affiliates of AGC Networks Ltd.

On November 11, 2018, Black Box’s Board of Directors caused the Company to enter into an agreement and plan of merger with AGC Networks Ltd. The Tender Offer is set to expire on December 19, 2018.

On November 21, 2018, Defendants filed a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement (the “Solicitation Statement”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in connection with the Proposed Transaction. The Complaint alleges that the Solicitation Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Solicitation Statement false and misleading.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on March 5, 2019. A related case continues under Docket 18-CV-02537 in the Central District of California.

On February 28, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. The related case was voluntarily dismissed on April 1.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Communications Equipment
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: BBOX
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Delaware
DOCKET #: 18-CV-01890
JUDGE: Hon. Colm F. Connolly
DATE FILED: 11/29/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/11/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/29/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.
  2. RM Law, P.C.
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: C.D. California
DOCKET #: 18-CV-02537
JUDGE: Hon. Colm F. Connolly
DATE FILED: 11/30/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/11/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/30/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Monteverde & Associates PC (Culver City)
    600 Corporate Pointe, Suite 1170, Monteverde & Associates PC (Culver City), CA 90230
    310.446.6652 310.446.6652 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available