Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 07/30/2019 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: November 06, 2018

According to the Complaint, OvaScience is a pharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of new treatment options for women and families struggling with infertility.

On August 9, 2018, OvaScience and Millendo Therapeutics, Inc. (“Millendo”) issued a press release announcing they had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated August 8, 2018 (as amended on September 25, 2018 and November 1, 2018, the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which OvaScience will merge with Millendo in an all-stock transaction.

On November 6, 2018, OvaScience filed a Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) with the SEC in connection with the Proposed Transaction. The Complaint alleges that the Proxy Statement, which recommends that OvaScience stockholders vote in favor of the Proposed Transaction, omits or misrepresents material information concerning, among other things: (i) the financial projections for Millendo, relied upon by OvaScience’s financial advisor in its financial analyses; and (ii) the background process leading to the Proposed Transaction and Company insiders’ potential conflicts of interest.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on July 30, 2019.


Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: OVAS
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Massachusetts
DOCKET #: 18-CV-12332
JUDGE: Hon. William G. Young
DATE FILED: 11/06/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 11/06/2018
  1. Bragar Eagel & Squire PC
  2. Matorin Law Office, LLC
  3. WeissLaw LLP
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available