Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 05/06/2019 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: October 25, 2018

According to the Complaint, Dycom provides specialty contracting services through subsidiaries throughout the
United States and in Canada. Dycom’s services include program management, engineering, construction, maintenance, and installation services for telecommunications providers, underground facility locating services for various utilities, including telecommunications providers, and other construction and maintenance services for electric and gas utilities.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Dycom’s large projects were highly dependent on permitting and tactical considerations, (ii) Dycom was facing great uncertainties related to permitting issues; (iii) said uncertainties would expose Dycom to near-term margin pressure and absorption issues, and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ statements about Dycom’s business, operations, and prospects, were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On January 11, 2019, the Court issued Orders consolidating cases and appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on March 13, 2019.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Capital Goods
Industry: Construction Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: DY
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 18-CV-81448
JUDGE: Hon. Robin L. Rosenberg
DATE FILED: 10/25/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/20/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/10/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Cullin O'Brien Law, P.A.
  2. Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 18-CV-81448
JUDGE: Hon. Robin L. Rosenberg
DATE FILED: 03/13/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/20/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/10/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Cullin O'Brien Law, P.A.
    6541 NE 21st Way , Cullin O'Brien Law, P.A. , FL 33308
    561-676-6370 561-320-0285 ·
  2. Labaton Sucharow LLP
    140 Broadway, Labaton Sucharow LLP, NY 10005
    212.907.0700 212.818.0477 · info@labaton.com
  3. Levi & Korsinsky (Stamford)
    733 Summer Street, Suite 304, Levi & Korsinsky (Stamford), CT 06901
    203-992-4523 ·
  4. Thornton Law Firm, LLP
    100 Summer Street, 30th Floor, Thornton Law Firm, LLP, MA 02110
    617.531.3933 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available