Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 08/06/2018 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: August 03, 2018

According to the Complaint, CA, Inc. ("CA" or the "Company") was founded in 1976 as Computer Associates International, Inc. and is an enterprise and mainframe software provider.

Broadcom Inc. designs and develops semiconductor devices used in telecommunication equipment and data center servers and storage systems. Broadcom’s business is operated through four segments: wired infrastructure, wireless communications, enterprise storage, and industrial and other.

The Proposed Transaction was first disclosed on July 11, 2018, when CA and Broadcom announced that they had entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which Broadcom will acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of CA for $44.50 per share (the “Merger Consideration”). The deal is valued at approximately $18.9 billion and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2018.

The Complaint alleges that Defendants caused a materially incomplete and misleading preliminary proxy statement (the “Proxy”) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on July 24, 2018.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: CA
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 18-CV-06996
JUDGE: Hon. John G. Koeltl
DATE FILED: 08/03/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/11/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 08/03/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Rowley Law PLLC
    50 Main Street, Suite 1000, Rowley Law PLLC, NY 10606
    914.400.1920 914.301.3514 ·
No Document Title Filing Date