Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 09/06/2018 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: June 13, 2018

According to the Complaint, Financial Engines, Inc. ("Financial Engines" or the "Company") is a leading provider of independent, technology-enabled financial advisory services discretionary portfolio management, personalized investment advice, financial and retirement income planning, and financial education and guidance.

On April 29, 2018, Financial Engines, Edelman Financial, L.P. ("Edelman"), and Flashdance Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Edelman (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Financial Engines, with Financial Engines continuing as the surviving corporation and as an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Edelman (the “Proposed Transaction”).

The Complaint alleges that on June 8, 2018, in order to convince Financial Engines’ stockholders to vote in favor of the Proposed Transaction, Defendants authorized the filing of a materially incomplete and misleading Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement (the “Proxy”) with the SEC, in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: FNGN
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 18-CV-03542
JUDGE: Hon. Edward M. Chen
DATE FILED: 06/13/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 04/30/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/13/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Monteverde & Associates PC (Culver City)
    600 Corporate Pointe, Suite 1170, Monteverde & Associates PC (Culver City), CA 90230
    310.446.6652 310.446.6652 ·
No Document Title Filing Date