Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 09/27/2018 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: May 24, 2018

Oclaro, Inc. ("Oclaro") designs, manufactures, and markets optical components, modules, and subsystems for the long-haul, metro, and data center markets worldwide.

According to the Complaint, the terms of the Proposed Transaction were memorialized in a March 12, 2018, filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form 8-K attaching the definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Oclaro will become an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Lumentum, and Oclaro shareholders will receive a mix of cash and stock totaling $5.60 in cash and 0.0636 shares of Lumentum common stock for each share of Oclaro common stock they own. At the time of the signing of the Merger Agreement, Lumentum shares were trading for $68.98, resulting in an approximate valuation of Oclaro shares at $9.99 per share. Thereafter, on May 17, 2018, Lumentum filed a Registration Statement on Schedule S-4 (the “S-4”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in support of the Proposed Transaction.

The Complaint alleges the Proposed Transaction is unfair and undervalued for a number of reasons. Significantly, the S-4 describes an insufficient sales process in which the Board only paid lip service to its fiduciary duties by creating a special committee of the Board to serve as an “M&A Committee”. However, the S-4 reveals that the M&A Committee was inherently flawed as Defendant, the Company CEO, and an inside Director, who stands to receive tens of millions of dollars upon the consummation of the Proposed Transaction, was selected to sit on the committee.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on July 27, 2018. A related case continues under Docket 18-CV-03435.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Technology
Industry: Semiconductors
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: OCLR
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 18-CV-03112
JUDGE: Hon. Vince Chhabria
DATE FILED: 05/24/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/12/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 05/24/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Brodsky & Smith, LLC (California)
    9595 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 900, Brodsky & Smith, LLC (California), CA 90212
    310.300.8425 310.300.8425 · clients@brodsky-smith.com
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 18-CV-03435
JUDGE: Hon. Vince Chhabria
DATE FILED: 06/09/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/12/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/09/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Monteverde & Associates PC
    350 Fifth Avenue, 59th Floor, Monteverde & Associates PC, NY 10118
    (212) 971-1341 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available