On or around 06/22/2018 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)
Filing Date: April 20, 2018
According to the Complaint, Microsemi Corporation ("Microsemi") designs, manufactures and markets high performance analog and mixed-signal semiconductor solutions.
On March 1, 2018, Microsemi issued a press release announcing it had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) to sell Microsemi to Microchip Technology Incorporated (“Microchip”) for $68.78 in cash per Microsemi common share (the “Merger Consideration”). The Proposed Transaction is valued at approximately $8.35 billion.
On April 19, 2018, Microsemi filed a Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) with the SEC. The Complaint alleges that the Proxy Statement, which recommends that Microsemi stockholders vote in favor of the Proposed Transaction, omits or misrepresents material information concerning, among other things: (i) Microsemi insiders’ potential conflicts of interest; (ii) Microsemi’s financial projections, relied upon by the Company’s financial advisor, Qatalyst Partners LP (“Qatalyst”); and (iii) the data and inputs underlying the financial valuation analyses that support the fairness opinion provided by Qatalyst. The alleged failure to adequately disclose such material information constitutes a violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as Microsemi stockholders need such information in order to cast a fully informed vote or seek appraisal in connection with the Proposed Transaction.
This case was voluntarily dismissed by the Plaintiff on June 22, 2018.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: Microsemi Corporation
Headquarters: United States
Ticker Symbol: MSCC
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
First Identified Complaint
Michael Rubin, et al. v. Microsemi Corporation, et al.
COURT: C.D. California
DOCKET #: 18-CV-00653
JUDGE: Hon. Cormac J. Carney
DATE FILED: 04/20/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/01/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/20/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
WeissLaw LLP (Beverly Hills)
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
Related District Court Filings
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available