Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 08/21/2020 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: March 28, 2018

Patterson Companies, Inc. ("Patterson") is one of the nation's only full-service distributors of dental products. The Company distributes its products mainly through two subsidiaries—Patterson Dental and Patterson Animal Health.

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants allegedly made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Defendants were engaged in a fraudulent and illegal price-fixing conspiracy; (2) the Company's revenue and earnings were fraudulently inflated by the illegal scheme; (3) the scheme was aimed at prohibiting sales to and price negotiations by group purchasing organizations ("GPOs") that represented small and independent dental practices; (4) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' statements about Patterson's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On August 30, 2018, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel. Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended Complaint on November 9. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the amended Complaint on January 18, 2019. On September 10, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part the Motion to Dismiss.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Medical Equipment & Supplies
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: PDCO
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Minnesota
DOCKET #: 18-CV-00871
JUDGE: Hon. Michael J. Davis
DATE FILED: 03/28/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 06/26/2015
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/28/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Robins Kaplan LLP
  2. Saxena White PA (Boca Raton)
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: D. Minnesota
DOCKET #: 18-CV-00871
JUDGE: Hon. Michael J. Davis
DATE FILED: 11/09/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 06/26/2013
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/28/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Klausner, Kaufman, Jensen & Levinson
  2. Reinhardt, Wendorf & Blanchfield Attorneys at Law
  3. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Diego)
  4. Robins Kaplan LLP
  5. Saxena White PA (Boca Raton)
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available