Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 10/15/2018 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: March 20, 2018

Facebook operates a social networking website that allows people to communicate with their family, friends, and coworkers.

According to the law firm press release, Facebook users have the ability to share and restrict information based on their own specific criteria. As of the end of 2017, Facebook had roughly 2.2 billion active users.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Facebook violated its own purported data privacy policies by allowing third parties to access the personal data of millions of Facebook users without the users’ consent; (ii) discovery of the foregoing conduct would foreseeably subject the Company to heightened regulatory scrutiny; and (iii) as a result, Facebook’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On August 3, 2018, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases and appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. The consolidated cases are captioned "In re Facebook, Inc. Securities Litigation." On October 5, the Court issued an Order consolidating cases.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Services
Industry: Communications Services
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: FB
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 18-CV-01725
JUDGE: Hon. Edward J. Davila
DATE FILED: 03/20/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/03/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/19/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Pomerantz LLP (Beverly Hills)
    468 North Cameden Drive, Pomerantz LLP (Beverly Hills)
    (818) 532-6499 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 18-CV-01725
JUDGE: Hon. Edward J. Davila
DATE FILED: 10/15/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/03/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/25/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (San Diego)
    12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (San Diego), CA 92130
    858.793.0070 858.793.0323 · blbg@blbglaw.com
  2. Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP
    20 West 23rd Street. Fifth Floor, Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP, NY 10010
    213.262.9333 ·
  3. Pomerantz LLP (New York)
    600 Third Avenue, Pomerantz LLP (New York), NY 10016
    212.661.1100 212.661.8665 · info@pomerantzlaw.com/
  4. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Francisco)
    100 Pine Street, Suite 2600, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (San Francisco), CA 94111
    415.288.4545 415.288.4534 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
No Document Title Filing Date