Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 06/14/2018 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: March 20, 2018

Validus Holdings, Ltd. ("Validus") provides reinsurance coverage, insurance coverage, and insurance linked securities management services worldwide.

According to the Complaint, on January 22, 2018, Validus and AIG issued a joint press release announcing they had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 22, 2018 (the “Merger Agreement”) to sell Validus to AIG for $68.00 per share in cash (the “Merger Consideration”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of AIG. The Proposed Transaction is valued at approximately $5.56 billion.

On March 7, 2017, Validus filed a Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) with the SEC.

The Complaint alleges that the Proxy Statement, which recommends that Validus stockholders vote in favor of the Proposed Transaction, omits or misrepresents material information concerning, among other things: (i) Validus insiders’ potential conflicts of interest; (ii) Validus’ financial projections prepared by Validus’ management and provided to and utilized by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan”) in connection with its evaluation of the Proposed Transaction; and (iii) the valuation analyses prepared by J.P. Morgan in connection with the rendering of its fairness opinion.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on June 14, 2018.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)
Headquarters: Bermuda

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: VR
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. New Jersey
DOCKET #: 18-CV-03828
JUDGE: Hon. Kevin McNulty
DATE FILED: 03/20/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 01/22/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 03/20/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. WeissLaw LLP
    551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600, WeissLaw LLP, NY 10176
    212.682.3025 212.682-3010 · info@wllawny.com
  2. Zemel Law, LLC
    78 John Miller Way, Suite 430, Zemel Law, LLC, NJ 07032
    862.227.3106 973.282.8603 ·
No Document Title Filing Date