Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 03/22/2018 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: February 15, 2018

According to the Complaint, Key Technology is the trusted partner to over 3,100 customers in 81 countries, providing process automation systems for the food processing and other non-food processing industries. The Company develops and manufactures automated digital sorting systems and integrates them with its advanced material handling technologies to provide complete solutions for processors of food and other processed products.

On January 25, 2018, Key Technology’s Board of Directors (the “Board” or “Individual Defendants”) caused the Company to enter into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Duravant LLC. On February 8, 2018, Defendants filed a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement (the “Solicitation Statement”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in connection with the Proposed Transaction.

The Complaint alleges that the Solicitation Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Solicitation Statement false and misleading.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on March 20, 2018.



COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Capital Goods
Industry: Constr. & Agric. Machinery
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: KTEC
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: E.D. Washington
DOCKET #: 18-CV-05027
JUDGE: Hon. Salvador Mendoza, Jr
DATE FILED: 02/15/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 01/25/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/15/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Breskin Johnson Townsend PLLC
    1111 Third Avenue, Suite 2230, Breskin Johnson Townsend PLLC, WA 98101
    206.652.8660 206.652.8660 ·
  2. Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.
    919 N. Market Street, Suite 980, Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., DE 19803
    302.295.5310 302.295.5310 · info@rigrodskylong.com
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available