Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 02/12/2018 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: February 09, 2018

Aflac is a Fortune 500 company servicing more than 50 million people worldwide. The Company is authorized to conduct insurance business in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, several U.S. territories and Japan. Aflac offers voluntary insurance policies designed to supplement traditional health insurance and protect individuals from depletion of assets and loss-of-income. Its products include insurance plans for accidents, cancer, critical illness/care, hospital indemnity, fixed-benefit dental, vision care, life and short-term disability.

The Complaint alleges that Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
(i) Aflac hired its sales associates under false promises of high compensation packages and worklife-balance;
(ii) Aflac misclassified its employees as independent contractors to reduce costs associated with unemployment insurance taxes and employment benefits; (iii) Aflac manipulated its average weekly producer equivalent metric to fabricate growth; (iv) consequently, Aflac violated its Code of Conduct and corporate social responsibility standards, and (v) as a result of the foregoing, Aflac’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Insurance (Accident & Health)
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: AFL
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: M.D. Georgia
DOCKET #: 18-CV-00031
JUDGE: Hon. Clay D. Land
DATE FILED: 02/09/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 02/27/2013
CLASS PERIOD END: 01/11/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Law Offices of David A. Bain, LLC
    1230 Peachtree St., NE, Law Offices of David A. Bain, LLC, GA
    404-724-9990 404-724-9986 ·
  2. Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
    30 Broad Street, 15 1h Floor, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, NY 10004
    212.363.7500 212.363-7171 ·
No Document Title Filing Date