Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 05/01/2019 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: February 07, 2018

According to the Complaint, Funko is a pop culture consumer products company engaged in selling a broad range of pop culture consumer products, featuring characters from a range of media and entertainment content, including movies, TV shows, video games, music and sports. Its products combine its proprietary brands and designs into properties it licenses from content providers.

This is a class action on behalf of persons and/or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Funko, Inc. Class A Common Stock (“common stock”) pursuant to its initial public offering and/or traceable to the Company’s Registration Statement (the “IPO” or the “Offering”) and its November 3, 2017, prospectus filed on Form 424B4 with the SEC in connection with its IPO (the “Prospectus”).

The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement and Prospectus contained materially misleading statements and/or omitted material information in violation of Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933.

On March 27, 2018, the Court issued an Order remanding this case to State Court. This case is remanded to the Superior Court of Washington in and for King County.

A related case continues in the District Court under Docket 18-CV-00812. On January 4, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel. Lead Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint on April 30.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Industry: Apparel/Accessories
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: FNKO
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: W.D. Washington
DOCKET #: 18-CV-00201
JUDGE: Hon. James P. Donohue
DATE FILED: 02/07/2018
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/02/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/07/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Keller Rohrback LLP (Seattle)
  2. Stull, Stull & Brody (New York)
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: W.D. Washington
DOCKET #: 18-CV-00812
JUDGE: Hon. James P. Donohue
DATE FILED: 04/30/2019
CLASS PERIOD START: 11/01/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 06/04/2018
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Scott + Scott LLP (NY)
    405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor, The Chrysler Building, Scott + Scott LLP (NY), NY 10174
    (212) 223-6444 (212) 223-6444 ·
  2. Tousley Brain Stephens PLLC
    1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2200 , Tousley Brain Stephens PLLC, WA 98101
    206.682.5600 206.682.5600 · contact@tousley.com
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available