On or around 01/04/2019 (Ongoing date of last review)
Filing Date: February 07, 2018
According to the Complaint, Funko is a pop culture consumer products company engaged in selling a broad range of pop culture consumer products, featuring characters from a range of media and entertainment content, including movies, TV shows, video games, music and sports. Its products combine its proprietary brands and designs into properties it licenses from content providers.
This is a class action on behalf of persons and/or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Funko, Inc. Class A Common Stock (“common stock”) pursuant to its initial public offering and/or traceable to the Company’s Registration Statement (the “IPO” or the “Offering”) and its November 3, 2017, prospectus filed on Form 424B4 with the SEC in connection with its IPO (the “Prospectus”).
The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement and Prospectus contained materially misleading statements and/or omitted material information in violation of Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933.
On March 27, 2018, the Court issued an Order remanding this case to State Court. This case is remanded to the Superior Court of Washington in and for King County.
A related case continues in the District Court under Docket 18-CV-00812. On January 4, 2019, the Court issued an Order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Counsel.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: Funko, Inc.
Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Headquarters: United States
Ticker Symbol: FNKO
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.