Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 10/01/2019 (Date of last review)

Filing Date: December 13, 2017

According to the Complaint, in connection with the Centra Initial Coin Offering (the “Centra ICO”), Defendants raised over $30 million in digital cryptocurrencies by offering and selling unregistered securities in direct violation of the Securities Act. Sections 5 and 12(a)(1) of the Securities Act provide for strict liability against any person who offers or sells an unregistered security.

The Complaint alleges that between approximately July 30, 2017 and approximately October 5, 2017, Defendants ran the Centra ICO during which they received over $30 million in digital currency investments in exchange for Centra Tokens (“CTR Tokens”). There are conflicting reports as to the actual amount raised, some reports indicate that the amount raised may have been closer to $50 million. The purported primary purpose of the Centra ICO was to raise capital to operate the “world’s first Multi-Blockchain Debit Card with a Smart and Insured Wallet” (the “Centra Debit Card”). In other words, the product to be offered was a debit card that would function on the Visa and Mastercard networks and allow instant transactions using digital currencies. Further, the Centra ICO claimed to be intended to raise capital to create an online marketplace called “cBay" that would be similar to Amazon and eBay. Additionally, Centra Tech recently has claimed to be creating their own Centra blockchain.

On April 11, 2018, the Court issued an Order appointing Co-Lead Plaintiffs and Counsel. Co-Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended Complaint on October 9. On December 21, four of the Individual Defendants filed Motions to Dismiss the amended Complaint. On May 13, 2019, the Court issued an Order granting the Individual Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. On June 5, Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed four of the Individual Defendants. On June 7, Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the remaining Individual Defendant. On June 13, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Class Certification. The Court issued an Order denying the Motion for Class Certification on September 16.


Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol:
Company Market:
Market Status:

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 17-CV-24500
JUDGE: Hon. James Lawrence King
DATE FILED: 12/13/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 10/05/2017
  1. Komlossy Law P.A.
  2. Levi & Korsinsky LLP (DC)
No Document Title Filing Date
COURT: S.D. Florida
DOCKET #: 17-CV-24500
JUDGE: Hon. James Lawrence King
DATE FILED: 10/09/2018
CLASS PERIOD END: 04/20/2018
  1. Komlossy Law P.A.
    4700 Sheridan St., Suite J, Komlossy Law P.A., FL 33021
    954.842.2021 ·
    212 East 39TH Street, LEVI & KORSINSKYY, NY 10016
    212.889.3700 ·
  3. Taylor-Copeland Law
    501 W. Broadway, Suite 800, Taylor-Copeland Law, CA 92101
    619.400.4944 ·
No Document Title Filing Date
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available