Processing your request


please wait...

Case Page

 

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 10/25/2018 (Other)

Filing Date: December 14, 2017

According to the Complaint, on November 22, 2017, defendants filed a Form S-4 Registration Statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Proposed Transaction.

The Complaint alleges the Registration Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Registration Statement false and misleading. Accordingly, plaintiff alleges the defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Registration Statement.

This case was voluntarily dismissed as moot on March 28, 2018. On June 21, Plaintiff filed a Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees and Expenses. On October 25, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Expenses.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Regional Banks
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: BYBK
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Maryland
DOCKET #: 17-CV-03699
JUDGE: Hon. George Levi Russell, III
DATE FILED: 12/14/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 09/27/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 12/14/2017
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Goldman & Minton, P.C.
  2. Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.
  3. RM Law, P.C.
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available