Case Page

 

Case Status:    ONGOING    
On or around 10/24/2017 (Ongoing date of last review)

Filing Date: October 23, 2017

According to the law firm press release, Rio Tinto is incorporated in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), and its ADRs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The Company, a mining and metals company, finds, mines, processes, and markets mineral resources. It has operations in Australia, North America, Asia, Europe, Africa, and South America.

During August 2011, Rio Tinto completed its purchase of certain coal assets in Mozambique for approximately $3.7 billion (net of cash acquired at acquisition). This business became known as Rio Tinto Coal Mozambique, or “RTCM.”

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose adverse information regarding RTCM’s true value.

More specifically, the complaint alleges: (a) within months of the purchase, now-former senior executives knew of material problems adversely affecting RTCM’s multi-billion dollar publicly reported valuation; (b) as time passed, the same senior executives knew of additional problems and events that, under applicable accounting rules, required an impairment analysis of RTCM and reductions in its reported valuation; (c) instead of timely performing the impairment analysis, these executives thwarted it and continued to tout RTCM’s value to investors; (d) when a concerned employee outside the normal financial control function discovered or suspected the senior executives concealed RTCM’s negative valuation from Rio Tinto’s Board of Directors, he bypassed them and directly alerted the Chairman, who ordered an investigation into RTCM’s true value; (e) on January 15, 2013, less than a year and a half after the purchase, the Board determined RTCM was severely impaired and should be written down by billions of dollars to $611 million; and (f) the impact of this writedown was reported to investors in Rio Tinto’s financial report on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013.

As a result of this news and other disclosures, Rio Tinto’s ADR price declined.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Basic Materials
Industry: Metal Mining
Headquarters: United Kingdom

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: RIO
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: S.D. New York
DOCKET #: 17-CV-08169
JUDGE: Hon. Analisa Torres
DATE FILED: 10/23/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 10/23/2012
CLASS PERIOD END: 02/15/2013
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (New York)
    One Penn Plaza, 36th Floor, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (New York), NY 01119
    212.752.5455 212.752.5455 · info@hbsslaw.com
No Document Title Filing Date