Processing your request


please wait...

 | Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

Bank of Napa, N.A.

Case Summary

Bank of Napa, N.A. Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 10/20/2017 (Notice of voluntarily dismissal)

Filing Date: October 06, 2017

According to the Complaint, On July 31, 2017, the Board caused Napa to enter into an agreement to merge and plan of reorganization (the "Merger Agreement")

On September 15, 2017, defendants filed a Form S-4 Registration Statement (the "Registration Statement") with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in connection with the Proposed Transaction. The Complaint alleges the Registration Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Registration Statement false and misleading.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on October 20, 2017.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: Bank of Napa, N.A.

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Financial
Industry: Regional Banks
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: BNNP
Company Market: OTC-BB
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Paul Parshall, et al. v. Bank of Napa, N.A., et al.

COURT: N.D. California
DOCKET #: 17-CV-05773
JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg
DATE FILED: 10/06/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/31/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 10/06/2017
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.
  2. RM Law, P.C.
  3. The Shuman Law Firm (San Francisco)
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 10/06/2017
2 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 10/20/2017
3 Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 10/20/2017

Reference Complaint

—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases