On or around 12/13/2017 (Court's order of dismissal)
Filing Date: September 29, 2017
According to the Complaint, this action stems from a proposed transaction announced on August 10, 2017 (the “Proposed Transaction”), pursuant to which Starwood Waypoint Homes (“SFR” or the “Company”) and Invitation Homes Inc. (“INVH”), and their respective affiliates, will combine with in a merger-of-equals. On September 20, 2017, Defendants filed a Form S-4 Registration Statement (the “Registration Statement”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in connection with the Proposed Transaction. The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Registration Statement false and misleading. Accordingly, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) in connection with the Registration Statement.
This case was voluntarily dismissed on December 12, 2017.
Company & Securities Information
Defendant: Starwood Waypoint Homes
Industry: Other (Mutual Fund)
Headquarters: United States
Ticker Symbol: SFR
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)
About the Company & Securities Data
"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.
In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
First Identified Complaint
Robert Berg, et al. v. Starwood Waypoint Homes, et al.