Processing your request


please wait...

 | Case Page

 | Case Page |

Case Page

 

Nutraceutical International

Case Summary

Nutraceutical International Securities Litigation

Case Summary

Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 09/15/2017 (Other)

Filing Date: July 21, 2017

According to the Complaint, on May 21, 2017, Nutraceutical’s Board of Directors (the “Board” or “Individual Defendants”) caused the Company to enter into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Nutrition Parent LLC (“Parent”) and Nutrition Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub,” and together with and Parent and HGGC, LLC, “HGGC”).

On July 12, 2017, defendants filed a proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in connection with the Proposed Transaction. The Complaint alleges the Proxy Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed Transaction, which renders the Proxy Statement false and misleading.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on September 14, 2017.

Company & Securities Information

Defendant: Nutraceutical International

COMPANY INFORMATION:

Sector: Consumer Non-Cyclical
Industry: Food Processing
Headquarters: United States

SECURITIES INFORMATION:

Ticker Symbol: NUTR
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data


"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.

First Identified Complaint

Robert Berg, et al. v. Nutraceutical International, et al.

COURT: D. Utah
DOCKET #: 17-CV-00830
JUDGE: Hon. David Sam
DATE FILED: 07/21/2017
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/22/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/21/2017
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  1. Abbott Law Firm
    3651 N 100 E STE 350 , Abbott Law Firm, UT 84604
    (801)374-3000 ·
  2. Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.
    919 N. Market Street, Suite 980, Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., DE 19803
    302.295.5310 302.295.5310 · info@rigrodskylong.com
  3. RM Law, P.C.
    1055 Westlakes Drive, Suite 3112, RM Law, P.C., PA 19312
    (484) 324-6800 ·
First Identified Complaint (FIC) Filings:
No Document Title Filing Date
1 Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 07/21/2017
2 Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 09/14/2017
3 U.S. District Court Civil Docket 09/15/2017

Reference Complaint

—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available

Related District Court Filings

—Related District Court Filings Data is not available
 
 

Cases