Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 01/22/2018 (Court's order of dismissal)

Filing Date: July 19, 2017

According to the Complaint, it is alleged that on July 17, 2017, in order to convince NCI shareholders to tender their shares, the Board authorized the filing of a materially incomplete and misleading Schedule 14D-9 Solicitation/Recommendation Statement (the “Recommendation Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In particular, the Recommendation Statement contains materially incomplete and misleading information concerning: (i) NCI’s financial projections; (ii) the valuation analyses performed by the Company’s financial advisors Wells Fargo & Co. LLC (“Wells Fargo”) and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (“Stifel”); and (iii) potential conflicts of interest Wells Fargo faced as a result of its prior dealings with HIG.

This case was voluntarily dismissed on January 15, 2018.


Sector: Technology
Industry: Computer Services
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: NCIT
Company Market: NASDAQ
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: E.D. Virginia
DOCKET #: 17-CV-00816
JUDGE: Hon. Liam O'Grady
DATE FILED: 07/19/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/19/2017
  1. Faruqi & Faruqi LLP (New York)
  2. MeyerGoergen PC
  3. Monteverde & Associates PC
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available