Processing your request

please wait...

Case Page


Case Status:    DISMISSED    
On or around 09/27/2017 (Stipulation and order of dismissal (voluntary dismissal))

Filing Date: July 14, 2017

According to the Complaint, on June 22, 2017, EnerNOC issued a press release announcing that they had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 21, 2017 (the “Merger Agreement”), by which Enel SpA’s subsidiary, Enel Green Power North America, Inc. (“Parent”), through Parent’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Pine Merger Sub, Inc. (“Purchaser,” and collectively with Enel SpA and Parent, “Enel”) would commence a tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) to acquire all of the outstanding shares of EnerNOC common stock for $7.67 per share in cash (the “Offer Consideration,”).

In connection with the commencement of the Tender Offer, on July 10, 2017, the Company filed a recommendation statement on a Schedule 14D-9 (the “Recommendation Statement”) with the SEC. The Complaint alleges the Recommendation Statement is materially incomplete and misleading because it fails to disclose material information about the facts and circumstances that led up to the Proposed Transaction.

On August 22, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Notice voluntarily dismissing this action. The Court granted an Order closing and terminating the actions on September 27.


Sector: Services
Industry: Business Services
Headquarters: United States


Ticker Symbol: ENOC
Company Market: New York SE
Market Status: Public (Listed)

About the Company & Securities Data

"Company" information provides the industry and sector classification and headquarters state for the primary company-defendant in the litigation. In general, "Securities" information provides the ticker symbol, market, and market status for the underlying securities at issue in the litigation.

In most cases, the primary company-defendant actually issued the securities that are the subject of the litigation, and the securities information and company information relate to the same entity. In a small subset of cases, however, the primary company-defendant is not the issuer (for example, cases against third party brokers/dealers), and the securities information and company information do not relate to the same entity.
COURT: D. Massachusetts
DOCKET #: 17-CV-11305
JUDGE: Hon. Indira Talwani
DATE FILED: 07/14/2017
CLASS PERIOD END: 07/14/2017
  1. Levi & Korsinsky LLP (DC)
  2. Matorin Law Office, LLC
No Document Title Filing Date
—Reference Complaint Complaint Related Data is not available
—Related District Court Filings Data is not available